The report explores the FCWC’s regional context and needs, relating these to research findings into transhipment operations. Through this analysis a number of key issues have been identified. These include:

• Opaqueness and conflicts in definitions which contribute to gaps in what is monitored and what is not monitored.
• Imbalance between regulatory frameworks resulting in well-regulated and unregulated fisheries operating side-by-side, resulting in a non-holistic approach to monitoring, control and surveillance (MCS) implementation, focusing mainly on the regulated fisheries.
• Patchwork in accountability, with port States assuming the majority of responsibility and work in respect to monitoring transhipment and port State measures, while flag States’ accountability and contribution is lacking.

The need to understand the role that transhipment plays in fisheries and blue economies and applying this understanding to improve how we manage transhipment has been internationally recognised. This resulted in the United Nations Committee on Fisheries requesting the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) to lead the development of international guidelines on fisheries transhipment, with the aim to improve the clarity and application of transhipment management and oversight. This report further informs this process, which is currently ongoing.

Seraphin Dedi Nadje, Secretary General of the FCWC, commented, “Transhipment is not allowed in the FCWC region, except under specific conditions and in designated areas. We welcome the ongoing international focus on transhipment. This report provides insight and background to support the discussion around the development of inclusive and balanced global transhipment guidelines in order that they prove relevant, useful and beneficial. Whilst the priority of the FCWC is to ensure the sustainable development of the fisheries resources in our Convention Area, we must be aware of the pressure on fish stocks due to IUU fishing, overfishing, climate change, harmful subsides and population growth, and the regional reliance on imported fish. So many factors that unfortunately make our region a hub for illegal transhipment.”

Imports of fish in the FCWC region are 24 times more by volume than the amount exported – most of this fish is destined to feed some of the West Africa region’s 280 million people. It is the most populous countries – Nigeria, Côte d’Ivoire and Ghana – that import the bulk of this fish at a cost of around one United States Dollar (USD) per kilogram (kg); in contrast exported fish is sold for an average of eight USD per kg.

Sandy Davies, Stop Illegal Fishing, said, “With this insight in mind, we have analysed transhipment to determine options for how we can respond to the challenges and capitalise on the opportunities that transhipment brings to the FCWC region. At present there is a clear focus that draws MCS effort away from monitoring the low-value high-nutrition fisheries that provide food and nutrition for the people of West Africa, and places that focus on the traceability of fish destined primarily for export. We must ensure that African interests are equally protected.”

Duncan Copeland, Executive Director, TMT, stated, “The transhipment issues identified in this report enable us to highlight operational and policy solutions for the FCWC region.  The need for better and more inclusive information sharing and accountability is clear. The West Africa Task Force has been instrumental in operationalising key FCWC commitments on sharing information and cooperating regionally to fight IUU fishing. This combined with a clear FCWC strategy on transhipment and the establishment of the Regional Monitoring, Control and Surveillance Centre provide a solid foundation to better regulate and monitor transhipment in the FCWC region.”